FREE EUROPE

 

Posted: 09 Mar 2014 11:13 AM PDT Authored by PANAGIOTIS TRAIANOU Europe has been captured by usurious mobsters The evil-doers have defeated the Generals It took three World Wars, thousands of millions of casualties and around 100 years for the Americans to conquer Europe The gang’s nesting lies in today’s Nazi Germany The end of WWI has left Europe in absolute shock. It had just gone through the ultimate human carnage. At a time when it hoped that technology would be the solution to all its problems, Europe witnessed the former take a shooting position and turn its sights on it, showing no mercy whatsoever. The wildest human instincts combined forces with modern technology and the result was utterly shocking. The human flesh just couldn’t get enough of the new machine guns invented by humans with the purpose to bump off their kind. Even animals have never been dealt with such slaughterous attitude. Technology spewed out death and death dropped all its weight on the human species. Whether in the form of a round or a poisonous gas, it attacked humans and brought devastation. From that moment on, human flesh and its properties stopped being the drawing line for ending warfare. It was the power of the hard steel that would determine the outcome of the battle, not the trained bodies of the people who held it. The time had come when just a finger – even of the most spineless man – functioning well enough to pull the trigger of the machine gun was more important than a hero’s body. What carried weight at that time was the intensity of the poisonous gas instead of the intense spirit of a brave warrior; it was the load of ammunition peoples had to spare instead of the load of a peoples’ bravery that carried the weight. There were no more humans-heroes for the simple reason that humans had stopped being the major players in a war. Humans were mere extras; victims; the target; the meat. The war machines had become the new major players. Even during the saddest shows put on throughout the centuries, humans had made a fine job of being the less important player; of becoming an extra; of becoming a piece of meat that technology had to eliminate.  The faceless and cold technology that had no emotions would mow down everything, whether it was ears of wheat or human bodies. Technology vies hard wheat as much an enemy as a hard human body. It makes no difference that wheat is dealt with a reaping machine and humans with a machine gun. All technology sees is a problem that needs to be dealt with the easiest and cheapest way possible. From the moment technology entered war as the major player the only result could have been a massacre. Supposing that in the cruelty of wars there had been even a slightest hint of chivalry which acknowledged the concept of mercy up until then, it had disappeared. Machines can show no mercy and troops have become destruction and death machines. They have become death production and substructure destruction kind of industries. Soldiers were no longer warriors but machine operators that produced death. Tanks did not function as a warrior’s armor but as safe working environments in an odd working space. Everybody was duped into a game the major players of which they had not knowledge of while they themselves played the meat for slaughter. All one has to do is take a look at some historical statistics of WWI and compare them to other war conflicts in prior times. During the Battle of the Somme, where the British Forces were led by General Douglas Haig, the situation reached an unprecedented level, even for the Superpower of that time. The Battle started in July 1st and the first day alone resulted in Britain numbering 60,000 casualties. With no need or cause, the British had wasted manpower greater than the army which once helped Alexander the Great to conquer half of Asia. By the end of the battle the British had traded 1,000,000 human lives for a strip of land. If that was the price the highly equipped Superpower had to pay, what price would the others – the most weak – be called to pay? Why has this change happened, though? Why has a practice exercised for centuries changed within a few years? Why has war become a simple matter of business of mass destruction and death? Why has the target suddenly shifted from conquest to destruction? The answer is simpler than the reader thinks. The demands of war are different for the simple reason that the bid dawgs are different. Until then, military people and political players of the great forces in Europe used to be the masters of the war but that has changed. The masters have changed, so the interests have changed as well, therefore it was only natural that they would change the course of action that could yield the much-desired profits. Until then, all ambitious politicians or military players dreamt of building empires, expanding them and providing them with new provinces which they would incorporate in their empires’ structures readily and easily. What does this mean? It means that wars broke out following a very specific rationale. People fought to protect what was theirs or seize what belonged to others. Humans fought against other humans with an aim to seize each other’s material possessions. Soldiers would kill their rival soldiers but wouldn’t destroy everything in their wake. They had a sense of values which they either protected or claimed. They fought each other but wouldn’t universally destroy anything in their way because it was foolish. You would claim the nice neighboring house, for example, in order to enjoy it yourself, not just tear it down. You would claim a space with infrastructures to exploit them yourself, not just destroy them. If you destroyed them, you devalued your conquest. If you razed them to the ground, your victory’s profits would go down the drain. You would turn the place into a desolate landscape which you yourself would have to develop and bring back to the condition that had made it desirable in the first place, using your labor and money.  Does the reader understand what we are expressing? Troops didn’t turn their conquests into lots because the latter brought minimum profits. Troops claimed plunders that would be as much intact from war destruction as possible. It was their owners they wanted get out of the picture, not the properties. We have watched all these things happen throughout the centuries. Regions like Alsace or Lorraine, Silesia, Rhineland or Westphalia have not been known to us for giving birth to great philosophers, brilliant artists or outstanding scientists. All these regions were European and have become known as celebrated spoils of war. They are regions that have shifted hands as the result of certain wars that had taken place. They are regions that became known when everything was achieved through the common standard logic of wars; the logic we knew existed since ancient history; the logic history lessons have taught us to analyze. All that changed after WWI. Wars suddenly lost their interest in land. They stopped targeting on conquest. They acquired a symbolic dimension. You would fight in one place but the profits were elsewhere. You would die in one place but the interests went far beyond. Mass slaughters would not take place over a strip of land as ignorant observers believed. Mass slaughters would allegedly take place so that humans would receive world first place in an allegedly world competition. Industrial capital claimed market domination worldwide and when the latter was saturated competitors fought against each other keeping a sort of an appointment. As if they were roughnecks, fans of football teams, they would make a rendezvous of death and the winner would rule far away from the rendezvous point. In other words, when Germany reached the limit of its competition abilities with Britain they made a rendezvous of death somewhere in Belgium. The target was no street of Belgium. Belgium was only the arena for the belligerents. Whoever won the fight in that rendezvous would be given domination on millions of square meters of markets as a price since the target for all that was world market. From that standpoint we realize that 60,000 British casualties within a day and over a few acres of land actually make sense. Given that the battles which involved conquest of tens of thousands of kilometers had become the place where the opposing sides could maximize their powers and the conquest was virtual and huge, the number of casualties was inevitably huge as well. It goes without saying that only the conquest was virtual, not the battle between actual humans. Has the reader understood what we are expressing? When the big dawgs changed, the goals changed as well. The case used to be that political-military leaders struggled to build empires by giving out feuds to the elite, but all that started to change. All of the sudden, new dawgs came to the front that obviously did not care about new feuds and conquests but market domination. So, here’s what we are asking the reader. Who were those new state leaders? If you ask a leftist, he’ll point to the formidable industrialists. If you ask capitalist Marx, he’ll point to the “capital”; If you ask the typical trade union advisors they will point to the capitalists. All of the above is correct. The question is how correct can these answers be if we are seeking the big dawgs? The actual leaders, not the ones they feed us with. If the reader can realize the truth, he will be able to explain a lot of things. In theory, those industrialists supported the new war pattern because they had their eyes set on the markets and dreamt of monopolizing the world. Still, could it be the case that those industrialists were mere pawns? Whose pawns, is the question. They were pawns of the people who could finance their activities to the full; of the people who could establish them in the world but also put them out of business at all times. Can’t an industrialist just spring up? An industrialist doesn’t want to become a feudal baron so that a new feud would be in order – hence blood – which would be seized from those who own it and who won’t give it up without a fight, as it is the natural thing to do. While feudal barons are an obsolete human category which can’t be changed easily, industry is free of such problems. A lot of people can become industrialists within the same territory without even competing each other. All each of them needs is a plot of land to develop vertically. Any kind of labor can evolve into an industry. A miller can become flour industrialist without changing job object. A milkman can become an industrialist too. A craftsman who manufactures earthen household utensils with his bear hands can also become an industrialist. A cartwright can become an automotive industrialist provided he has proper funding. Namely anyone who manufactures anything can become an industrialist. He can create a bigger space for all the craftsmen to have enough room in order to produce in huge amounts what he used to produce in the small workshop of his. It is the quantities – hence the scales – that change and nothing else. What's the purpose of the reference to all these? We want the reader to understand that formidable industrialists are not as formidable as the Marxists depict them to be. They act tough to the people they give orders to but they also have people they answer to. Who could these people be, though? What need drives all these people to become industrialists? The answer is money. What do people who have already become industrialists seek? Is it money again? Therefore, whoever’s got the money can make an industrialist out of them but also blackmail them later on. Even if that person creates them, they cannot escape his power. He can blackmail with professional suffocation and death any time he wants. Consequently, industrialists are the powerful ones in the system in theory only. They are powerful as long as they are industrialists, hence as long as they are kept in business by the people who have the money, namely the bankers. We have come to the point where we can conclude that the actual dawgs in Europe, which was torn apart by symbolic domestic wars, were the bankers. Feudal barons may have been the leaders of colonial wars but bankers were the leaders of the domestic industrial European wars. The bankers presented the industrialists as the leaders of the conflicts while in reality they were just a facade. These same bankers would buy off Marx to depict them to the masses as daemons. These same bankers would buy off communists to whip up the masses against industries and consequently against the country itself whenever they felt threatened. The new bank leaders – as it has become clear now – had different needs to satisfy by means of war. They did not care about the outcome because they had made sure to collect in advance the profits from the war before the latter had even broken out. How did this work? They would finance both belligerents with the same amount of money and when war reached the point it suited them they would stop funding the side they had already decided to be the defeated one. It is as if they were funding a diving competition which, when they wanted ended, they would cut the air supply of the diver it suited their interests to lose. They were the sole ones to make the decisions and they were the sole ones to collect from everybody. They had to take simple actions, really. There was no need for them to constantly search for new battle fields and war causes. They could cause world wars in the same space, for the same reasons and with the same major players in perpetuity. The bankers inflated the power of their desirable belligerents and the same bankers deflated it. The same people funded both war and peace. The same people who lent money to the belligerents for weapons supply were the same people that lent them money to build everything they themselves had brought down with these weapons. No matter what happened, these financial backers would get paid by both belligerents. Whether winners or losers, everybody was in their debt. Things are simple. Regardless of being the winner or loser, the money will be paid to the same bankers. The people the borrowed war money is owed to are the same people who will lend them the money for their national revival. This is exactly what the bankers look for. They look for people who are suckers for their nation and consider themselves winners even if they go bankrupt. They look for so-called patriots who are defeated, yet pluck up their courage and through hard work miraculously reconstruct their country.  Does the reader understand the mentality behind all the irrational situations we analyzed at the beginning of this essay? Does the reader understand why the unpredictable nature of war has changed into another lethal routine? Has the reader understood that the field of heroes’ glory has turned into a wearisome industry whose workers produce death and destruction? Once industrialists were pushed to war for survival by their financial backers, war was inevitable to adopt their logic and of course their technology. Being industrialists and the most powerful members of society, they were about to become the major players of the war and that situation would change the nature of war itself. In such case, attributes like bravery or warriors’ passion were unrequired.  The industrial era soldier was no longer a potential national hero. He became a common worker in the national industry of death. The same person who worked in factories as the industrialist’s employee had become death’s employee. He would slip into his working uniform and get down to business in the battle field. Just like a sewer stitched fabrics in the factory using strong and reliable sewing machines, the same way the soldiers – being decent workers – would stitch their kindred with bullets using their effective and reliable machine guns. Has the reader understood what we are expressing? Industrialists warred against each other over who would offer his workers the best machines that would help them predominate the war market; machines that would make them more competitive, hence more efficient. What was the target, hence the production of those death workers? It was destruction; utter annihilation. The more they destroyed the merrier. This is how the new logic behind war became linked to its new targets. The better the machines a worker had at his disposal, the greater the destructions he could bring on. Why? It was because that’s what their big dawgs wanted. Mostly, it suited their dawgs’ big dawgs. It didn’t so much suit those who actually gave the fight – namely the industrialists – as it suited the people who put them up to it – namely the bankers. If their bosses could produce excellent machines, they would receive the loans they needed to survive from the bankers. Still, what did the big dawgs want to achieve through war? They wanted to bring destruction, absolute and global destruction. Why? It was because these people were not Generals or politicians but bankers. They stood to gain from destruction. Loans are required to make up for destruction and loans are the bankers’ joy. The bombs that were built to bring down everything came from loaned money and everything that was rebuilt came from loaned money. All they wanted was to give new loans, not possess new feuds; this is how far their ambition went. They wouldn’t mind if others took glory. They were bankers and usurers and wars were their means to maintain their old clientele but also expand it. The more people involved in wars, the more loan applications they would receive. The greater the destruction, the more money they would lend to those who wanted to make restorations. Do any of the things mentioned so far strike unreasonable to the reader? Has the reader understood the reason why the logic of war of the previous centuries has changed? The bid dawgs are different and their interests and tactics are different. Still, those usurious bankers who were interested in profits and collecting interests had to act as Generals as well since they were involved in bloody war games. Given the fact that they caused war outbreaks – which yielded profits as well as losses to them – they had to possess strategic thinking. Logistics knowledge didn’t suffice any more; history knowledge was in order as well. They had no choice but to combine basic economic knowledge with strategic thinking. Given the fact that wars provided them with the means to strengthen their positions or lose their all, they had to think like Generals, hence set strategic goals; goals that would strengthen their positions as their opponents would love to overthrow them; goals imperative to achieve because their little games cost innumerous human lives and they would never get away with it once their victims became aware of it. In order to meet this new need of combining different fields of knowledge they invested money on the new kinds of sciences of that time which universities like Harvard promoted; universities which were controlled by them and evolved into the nesting which the new generation of usurers is going to rise from. Mickey-Mouse sciences have developed in those universities which were necessary for the usurers’ system to work out. The said sciences combined the knowledge of the gypsies and usurers with that of Generals which brought about fields of study like Cybernetics, International Relations and other ridiculous notions presented as disciplines. It was the natural order of things. The usurers needed to hire usurers trained to think like Generals, so they invested on these types of disciplines. These kinds of scientists would be the ones to determine the new reality. Once you have enough power to set wars in motion which – for reasons of profit – you are trying to implicate everybody into, what could possibly be your main strategic goal? Once the people involved in your prefab wars call them world wars, what could possibly be a reasonable target? The creation of an international coordination body so that the deadly show can be organized without hindrance. An obscure global Government as a good-for-nothing person like Giorgakis Papandreou would have said; the man, who suited theirs purposes; their man; the man who has received the education they offer and has graduated from their science incubators. What other lessons have we learnt from that slap-happy nitwit? We have learnt that it is possible – in case of a nation independent in papers only – for a financial loss to become a military defeat. Namely, we have learnt the ways that usurers who think like Generals can bring their opponents to their. Let me remember how he put it: “When you are in debt you have to give up part of your sovereignty.” The same words came out of Mario Draghi’s mouth, President of the European Central Bank. The same was phrased by the crippled brute in Berlin as well as the bankers’ servants, in all possible ways. All these are known to everybody. Given that these things are known to everybody now, it can only mean that the people who set them in course had the said knowledge at a time when nobody else did. Where does this lead us to? It leads us to conclude that there are now facts which verify that the target of the usurers who acted as Generals was indeed world sovereignty. When exactly was this target set? Ever since they discovered that they can manipulate competitiveness, thus the power of industrial states. Ever since they realized that they can use their money as a means to blackmail industrialists any time it suits them. Ever since they realized that they can blackmail everybody with labor revolutions any time they want. Ever since, for – seemingly - inexplicable reasons, national dominant states have accorded them the privilege of controlling the banking sector. Relinquishing control of its banking sector to private individuals equals to suicide for a state and this is clearer today than it has ever been. Why is that? It is because now we have the actual result of the suicide in front of us whereas in the older days you had to analyze an unidentified disease the aftermath of which you had no knowledge of. Everyone can understand now the implications of banking sector privatization of the banking sector. In today’s time when world economy is as dead as a doornail we can understand what the whole purpose of money control by private bankers is. We can understand what is involved in giving over control of a FED to private individuals. It is exactly what Rothschild used to warn us about a century ago but we would not listen. We could not understand and we rushed off to fight his wars and play the heroes who sacrifice themselves for their country. In reality, though, we were mere extras in a show put on by Rothschild with enormous profits and no personal gain. It was a blood-curdling show since the more heroic the extras were, the more destruction they would bring about to the extras of the opposite side. It was an industrial show where the more self-conscious the uniformed workers of death were the more competitive the big dawgs were. The more destruction it was brought about on a nation the bigger the scale of conquest for Rothschild and his compatriots was. This was the way for the usurious vultures to deluge the world with money owed and swallow it up. They did not care about actual world conquest as they had conquered it in financial terms. Each new war that was generated would yield even bigger ownership percentages of the supposedly free countries. The Jews are standing at the most challenging crossroad of their history Even though it will strike as really strange, Jews’ current endangerment -   which brings on an attempt to overthrow the Christian empire - was not an easy decision to make. They had made a high risk decision based on their knowledge that in case they failed they would lose their all – as it is the case in today’s time as well. It was a well-nigh coercive decision-making. Societal and financial evolution propelled them to seek for excessive profits even if it meant jeopardizing their very existence. What we are saying has some logic. A small nation asserting such lordship and wealth at the expense of the other nations is provocative for one thing and the other nations won’t just put it behind them. These behaviors are not just games; they mean war which costs in actual human blood. Millions of people have died and much more have fallen into misfortunes so that the Jews can have their enormous profits. That being said, their situation ought not to be treated as a monopoly game. It is not as if the peoples are going to think: “Okay, we’ve been tricked by the Jews because they are artful so we have to hand it to them and accept being financially subjected to them.” Once nations realize that you have defeated them without shedding a drop of blood, they will make you feel bloody sorry. They will send you to hell just for thinking of playing smart on them. The nations will literally make you bleed once they realize that you have been plotting against them for so many years with the mere purpose to subjugate them in order to increase your profits.  The Jews had knowledge of the situation. They have never been naive and neither are they now. We would be the last ones to call them that. They knew the risk their attack involved. This is the point where the readers wonder about the validity of our assertions. Could a small nation assert world sovereignty? Of course it could; not so much because it was a clever nation but because of its specialized skills. The Jews were in the privileged position of controlling financial sector within the Christian territory. The Jews have always known their handle’s dynamics. They have proved it in many kindred situations. The entire New York and its underworld there would kill each other and collect protection money to pay off their usurers. You don’t need to be ruthless and murderous like Al Capone to be able to control the neighborhood and rake in from its activities, whether legal or illegal. Being the one who gives the orders to Al Capone can have the same results. Besides, he is no different than anyone who dreads of his banker who is the person he really needs; the person who will provide him with the money to buy guns and cars that will help him remain the redoubtable Al Capone; the person who will create competitiveness for the new Tommy guns and the new Ford cars. If that Al Capone guy finds himself in a financial difficulty, who is going to become the real neighborhood capo (Mafia boss)? The answer is his banker; the person who Al Capone kills people and collects money for. Who rakes in from the shootouts in the streets? Is it the hard-core scarface mobster we watch in the movies?; the one who spends money on hookers, alcohol and gambling? Of course he is not. The money that comes from business in the underworld are dirty and they need laundering. Someone has to do it, otherwise dirty money can’t make you rich; on the contrary, they can send you to jail. That macho man Al Capone, for example, wasn’t sent to prison with murder charges but tax evasion charges. What do we conclude, therefore? We conclude that the person who actually makes a load of money risk-free is the banker who is the mastermind behind the mobster; the white collar banker who has never laid eyes on a pistol, yet, he knows how much it costs and what it has to yield in terms of bodies to make up for the interest money. When did the outburst of organized crime in the USA take place? Was it the moment the poor Sicilians got hold of guns? Of course it was not. They had been committing crimes with pocket knives; they had no need of expensive guns. The outburst of organized crime in the USA occurred when Jewish bankers, immigrants from Europe joined the organized crime; when the new members of the organized crime were the people who were going to fund the criminals so that the latter can buy guns and not get their hands dirty using the pocket knives; when members of the organized crime became the people who could make crime a lot more profitable for the criminals and offer them their services in laundering these profits. That’s when the actual outburst occurred. Once the new members of the organized crime were the people who would set new goals and new ground for the local crime to be perpetrated; once people who through corrupt state officers created public policies which favored crime, hence the rake-in. It is clear as a bell that state officers who had been greased by the usurers came up with the idea of Prohibition. The huge amounts of money that came from Prohibition made gun-slingers and usurious bankers partners.  Similar was the situation inside the Christian empire as a whole. When did the outburst of World Wars take place? When the banking mobsters of New York felt that they had become too powerful to just content themselves with cheap mafia pistol games at the whorehouses of the American megacity. When they felt that the bottles of whisky would not suffice. That was the moment they decided to turn against Europe. They used their infinite amount of dirty money to fund nations that served as mobsters instead of funding real common mobsters. Instead of giving money for pistols and cars purchases, they gave them for cannons and tanks. What they have actually done is turn global society into an environment they were at home with; into a rich neighborhood which the mafia of the powerful industrial states asserted power of. It was a mafia kind of organization whose members clashed with each other in their efforts to maximize their share of profits.  Industrial states had been brainwashed by bankers to act as ruthless and armed mafia leaders who asserted power over global neighborhood under the threat of guns. They did not assert the same neighborhood as Generals but rather behave as common mobsters who asserted the pimping money at the lot of the neighborhood market. The Jewish bankers funded such states so that the latter can behave as contentious criminals. Things are simple. They corrupted everybody and had the power to blackmail everybody as well. They brought politics down to the street level and became the grandmasters. Common criminals were about to become state leaders and infect the states with their evil characteristics. Tommy guns would become cannons and everything else would remain unchanged. Things are simple. Gothamite scums – like the Rockefellers, the Morgans and the Goldmans – have planned the imperialism of the previous century. One state would be the equivalent of Al Capone and another state would be the equivalent of Luciano. The sovereign familia would have their allies and would always be armed, dangerous and ready to cause havoc. They would threat and blackmail nations offering them protection and of course products. They would be pimps and suppliers at the same time. Mafia would have a specialization. The disobedient ones would probably find a bullet stuck in their head. The global game of industrial geostrategic would be played within this familiar to the Jews surroundings. Criminals would become members of the high classes of the states. No problem here. Nations would be governed by common street criminals and their competitiveness games would be funded by Jewish bankers. The latter would be the ones to print their placards, make sure the media would praise them, organize their assemblies and protect them. Once they had given power over to them they would be in the position to give orders. They would blackmail them and have them in their pocket.  This is how the states of the industrial era were programmed to function. Roosevelt, Hitler or Churchill were nothing more than mere criminals. They were people who stood at attention when the bankers entered their offices; people whose whole life was kept in a file at the bankers’ desk as a means for the latter to blackmail them. These are the people who have made the states what they are since it was they who decided what solution to present in each crisis. They would find a solution that would create the need for a new solution in a few decades time. Having control over the organization of states, the Jewish bankers toyed with their needs. They toyed with their needs repetitively and in the same manner and every time they boxed them up harder and harder. In the end, they managed to turn them into overindebted employees of theirs who were completely unaware of their actions. That’s the whole planning. Every time an Al Capone-like man and a usurper and agitator Luciano-like man eliminated each other in the streets, they took bigger and bigger loans which increased the shares of the usurers. In the end, they killed each other without a cut just because extensive damages were in the interest of the bankers. The World Wars were one of such bankers’ wangle. These wars between states-criminals gave them the means to climb at the top of the world without even having to place themselves in any battlefield. It was their way to assert world sovereignty. The only difference is that this sovereignty was nominal rather than actual. It is like painting a castle instead of building it. This world sovereignty was the result of the need of the participants, not the winner’s power. It’s a sovereignty that results from the malfunction of the existing systems rather than the appearance of new systems. It is a kind of sovereignty similar to the one a horse fly has when it provokes fights among buffalos in order to drink the blood from their wounds. It’s the sovereignty of the usurers’ markets, not the Generals’ armies. It was easy for the Jews to attempt to exercise such practice since they were well aware of the lot of the leaders of Christianity. Τhey were at home with upper echelons of Christian leadership, a fact that added value to the know-how of crimes they possessed in order to be able to assert the world ruling “paint”. Their ultimate advantage was that they had a very close connection to the sovereign power; a lot closer than the usual one; too much close as the powerful Christian leaders have never considered them a threat, therefore they kept no secrets from them. They were foreigners, people of different creed, people of naught and they were posing no threat so nobody guarded themselves against them. They were like the eunuchs who were allowed to wonder around the powerful men’s concubines for the simple reason that they were no threat to them. The Jews functioned as that kind of useful eunuchs inside Christianity. They had knowledge of everything because nobody saw them as rivals, hence as a threat. Once you lend money to Popes and European kings it’s easy to have knowledge of their financial troubles, let alone since the Jews knew not these secrets only as they paid notice to other secrets as well. The Jews were not only the usurers of the powerful people, they were their pimps too. They delivered them both the girls and the boys they longed for. They were the powerful people’s drug dealers; the ones to make sure they had all the dope they wanted. They were also the powerful people’s hit men. They were the ones to deliver them from the competitors, usurers or just kill people to satisfy their perverted thirst for blood. They were also the powerful people’s doctors who relieved them of an unwanted syphilis on the quiet. In other words, the Jews had knowledge not only of the European states’ financial situation but also of their skeletons in the cupboard which gave them leverage to blackmail them and ultimately enslave them, and this is exactly what the Jews have done. This is why we consider the fact that they had knowledge of the dirty secrets of the prominent figures of Christianity to have been to their advantage. They knew their dirty secrets and took the risk of blackmailing corrupt leaders. In any case, it is a considerable risk and involves a lot of dangers. The thing is that they knew that blackmail combined with their special knowledge in banking issues would allow them to easily reach to the current position of almightiness. Still, they were very well aware of the fact that the higher the fall the greater the pain. Besides, they have perfectly portrayed this in one of their curses. Does the reader know what the Jews’ worst curse is? What is it that they wish to someone when they want to curse him? They do not just wish for someone to be ruined. They wish for that person to obtain the whole world and then lose it.   They wish for him to taste absolute happiness so that he knows exactly what he misses in case of failure. In other words, the Jews are aware of the maximum pain the maximum loss brings about. Being poor and losing your few belongings is not enough for them. They want you to become rich and then lose your all, including your mind. They want the loss to be so huge that will make you go crazy. They want you to want to kill yourself being unable to return to your prior state of being. They are aware that having everything one has ever wanted is not necessarily a good ending but most probably the bitter beginning of a bad ending. Time for the big decisions We will take things from the start for the reader to understand the factors that led them to assert world sovereignty; that led them to assert the reign of their nation over all others. It all began with the industrial revolution, thus with the outburst of nationalism. Until then, the Jews had no second thoughts about harming the Christians. They had set things up for themselves and had no further ambitions. They led a good, risk-free life. The powerful Jews provided their services and made their piles and the poor Jews were an unfailing human source accommodating these services to be carried out. It’s where the rich Jews got hold of prostitutes, hit men, singers, magicians, cut-throats or whatever the powerful Christians asked for which they could not obtain legally within the Christian society. The Jews lived daily in an in-between state of lawfulness and lawlessness because it was their key to a free life within a fervently Christian world. Because of their bourgeois specialization they had no choice but to spread in different parts of the world. There was no room for all of them in the same place because one’s activities would unavoidably interfere with another’s and lead to conflict. Every usurer taught his art to three children and the latter had to scatter around the world so that they won’t be in each other’s way. In other words, separation and migration were a blessing for the Jews, not the other way round. Home was not their birth place but a loaded place. From that point on, they would use the practical guide. They would start their lives equipped with all the necessary information, so they were in an advantageous position: “Go to that city whose Mayor is a child molester and tell him that Jacob has sent you”, or “Go to the other city whose judge is a drug addict and tell him that David has sent you.” They circulated in the fringe of high society where they could rake in, make acquaintances with high-rank people and secure protection. Most people loathed them but the powerful ones worshiped them. They were their special friends who would fund wars as well as parties. They were their special friends who would bring through the back door anything that was illegal to bring through the front door. All powerful Christians wanted to have a Jewish friend; nevertheless, they would never invite him to their house. He would be the kind of friend you only wave to from a distance, signaling what it is that you want him to get you this time: “You know, the same as the last time.” Was that a gun, drugs, a hooker, a child? Nobody knew, no matter how hard he tried to eavesdrop. The special friends were the only ones who knew. Industrial evolution changed all that. In theory it was in the interest of the Jews who were becoming members of the bourgeois but in reality it threatened them with professional death. In theory, it actually suited them because they were usurers living in a world that would soon develop to such an extent that a load of money would be needed on the fly. In a world that would be a lot more complicated than feudalism, money would have a leading role and they were the experts on the matter. Yet, this new world was immensely menacing to them because business would spread among the big masses of middle class Christians and the Jews would no longer wield the scepter in the sector. There would be many Christians to compete with, many and dangerous. It is only logical that this would happen. Industrial evolution equals to nationalism growth as these two concepts support each other. They jog each others’ development. Industrial societies needed nationalism in order to develop and the latter evolved easily inside that kind of societies. Powerful industrial states did not concern themselves with new conquests because territorial expansion was not their concern. Industrial states wanted to climb up in power and nationalism would be the binding concrete that would provide industrial states with that possibility for certain. But for nationalism, industrial states could not climb up in power. But for nationalism, they would not have been able to coercively sell protection neither could they have developed the national mentality of consumerism which boosts the growth of local industrial production. Nationalism creates a moral obligation to consumers to buy even the lowest in quality product or the most expensive because it is in the interest of their nation. Nationalism creates a feeling of guilt to workers who agree to cut down on their demands for the factory to become more competitive. Nationalism introduces concepts like patriotism, bravery, self-sacrifice to the production field. This kind of nationalism – combined with the peculiarities of the industrial sector – has provided to states that could not stand a chance in earlier times the means to participate in the game of world primacy; states that had minimum power to carry out a global target; states like Germany. It is clear that it was only a matter of time before this kind of nationalism pointed at Jews as being different and hostile. Jews – with leading figures like Theodor Herzl – were awake to the existence of a new occurrence. There was an outburst of new kind of ant-Semitism which bore no resemblance to prior Christian anti-Jewish attitudes. It was a new type of anti-Semitism which pictured Jews not only as sinners – because of Jesus’ sacrifice – but also unwelcome competitors within the states that hosted them and which presented no issues of survival until then. The feeling of nationalism inside the Christian nations created a hostile atmosphere towards the Jews which related to money rather than their religion. There were some people who simply took advantage of their religious dissimilarity to make them targets of the simple Christians and bring them in a difficult position as their competitors. That is to say, the religious content of anti-Zionism was not the real reason for that behavior. The real reason was competition. A big and dangerous competition which constantly grew in dimensions since, because of industrialization, we have massive urbanization of Christian populations, therefore a rising rivalry with the Jewish communities. There were Christians, that is, who received education or did business in the big cities of the industrial era and entered sectors which had been traditionally monopolized by Jews. The Jews hadn’t faced any competition problems until then. They had been given privileges by the Pope. We are referring to actual privileges granted to them in the form of Papal Bulls and seals affixed to them. Their specialization, for example, in the banking sector was not the result of their cleverness against other people’s naivety. It was Rome that gave them the privilege. Why? Rome was artful. During the times of the feudal system Rome’s goal was to draw a distinct line in society between those who had it all and those who had nothing; between its favorite feudal barons and their young servants, the villeins; between the educated capitalists and the illiterate workers of the feuds. The said distinction was the means to make society vulnerable to manipulation. The few could lead a good life in this world and the rest would wait to find a better life in the next world. Nevertheless, the orderly functioning of society required people of enterprise that would belong to the bourgeois. It needed educated or capable people to develop business; people who may not have had a capital but their businesses yielded capital gains. Rome did not want the businesses of the middle class people to become the El Dorado of smart villeins, so it decided to close the door on them. Rome labeled bourgeois activity a sin and handed it over to the supposed sinners. This way, the huge profits from the bourgeois activity would pass to the hands of the Jews with the different decree, so Rome could rest assured. It would be centuries before the villeins would be able to get any kind of education and realize that they too deserved more than the fate feudal barons’ pigs had. This was Rome’s way to legitimize the Jews’ presence inside the Christian world and give them a major role in society. It was an extremely substantial role which became more and more substantial as time passed by and societies developed. The Jews were the only ones to be voluntarily vile people and do all the dirty work, that’s why they were the ones to meet the needs of Christian societies, whatever they  may have been, legal or not. They did not meet their needs only in their capacity as lawyers, doctors or artists – education they were able to receive in such difficult times because they had money – but also in their capacity as usurers, pimps or actors. They were very important elements in the Christian societies’ functioning. Rome itself had consented with Jews being part of its society and in fact it had vested that right in them. There may have been incidents of persecutions – or obligation to wear red caps some times – but they had a vested right to be part of that society. They were a necessary element for the society to function. Even the poorest of the Christians would watch them making their pile and still did not consider them a competition because he had no intention of getting involved in their business. His lack of interest was similar to a person’s who doesn’t want to become a pimp or a pusher regardless of the apparent huge profits. He wouldn’t chase those people away from his city because he wanted whores to be available as long as the latter wasn’t one of his daughters. This is how the religionist Christians viewed the bourgeois business which the Jews were the ringleaders of. They were the necessary evil turned into heaven when the sun went down. Those were different times; dark times when even medicine was considered the devil’s art by some zealots because they believed it questioned God’s right to decide who will join Him in Heaven, even if a simple cold is the cause of the death. The outburst of the industrial activity changed all that. The Christian populations abandoned their unproductive homelands and swarmed the cities which had a lot of opportunities to offer them. The zealously religious villeins abandoned the fields and experienced life in cobbled streets for the first time. This situation changed the nations’ manners and customs. Everybody got familiarized with bourgeois activity, so they started looking favorably upon the huge profits of such activities. The workers’ children could stay home as they had stopped working in the factories with their fathers as it was the case with the children of the villeins who worked in the fields. This meant that they could get an education. At first, they would acquire a smattering of learning by priests and teachers who volunteered to teach them and later on they would receive education by organized educational systems. The more industrial production strengthened, the bigger the need for trained personnel became which created the need for an organized educational mechanism. The more production grew the bigger the concern of the industrialists to acquire loyal customers became and that was something they had to pave the way to even inside the organized educations systems. They would nurture the faithful supporters of their products there; they would nurture the faithful enemies of their enemies’ products. That being said, schools were originally created with the purpose to impose flag-waving fanaticism rather than civilization. The school would have the function of chauvinistic Madrasahs which would produce whatever was in the interest of the system. That huge social production would have to find its way into society. Some of these children would follow their father’s footsteps and become workers but some others would become scientists and experts; experts on matters of science and experts on matters of the gutter. It was a matter of time before the bourgeois in industrial states started proliferating in rapid rates. All these people would do business on the streets of the big cities which up until then were monopolized by the Jews who were about to become real enemies and rivals. What does this mean? It means that the anti-Semitic feelings of the feudal era and the anti-Zionism of the industrial era were two completely different things. The reasons why an ardent Christian of the feudal era was anti-Jewish were completely different from the reasons why a freshly bourgeois Christian of the industrial era was anti-Zionist, and so were the interests. The Christian of the feudal era was merely possessed by the stupid hatred of a fanatic religionist who just hates to associate sinners who believe in a different decree and see them wander about his neighborhood. The Christian of the industrial era was possessed by the targeted hatred of a fanatic too, only not in the religious sense but in the business sense. He was a ruthless professional who invoked the matter of religion having an ulterior motive, but in reality all he wanted to succeed was kick Jews out of his neighborhood so that their activities can pass on to his hands. People like Herzl took notice of that kind of anti-Zionist nationalism which targeted the big money and tried to stop its evolvement. People like him tried to deal with nationalism, not imitate it as a nation as many historians erroneously contend.  The Jews were impervious to that kind of nationalism. Why? It’s because they didn’t need it. The Jews themselves had already been extreme nationalists when others were absolutely nothing. They have always had beliefs regarding their nation which had been had by any other nation would have gotten them in prison. They have always believed that they are God’s Chosens; the best, the most competent and the most superior of all. The outburst of nationalism against the Jews does not explain the latter’s national campaign against them. The Jews were totally impervious to other’s feelings of nationalism. It is like claiming that the fashion regarding summer tanned bodies got under the black people’s skin and drove them massively to the beaches to get a tan. Similarly, the Jews lack the need for theories by nationalists that will make them more hard-line nationalists than they already are. Their religion alone produces the most powerful and ardent nationalism. Even their archpriest said it once: “It is in our interest to kill Jesus to save our nation.” They are capable of killing even the son of God if that means saving their nation. Calling a Jew a nationalist is redundancy. It’s like calling someone a well-built athlete or a deflowered prostitute. Can someone be an athlete and not be well-built? Can someone be a prostitute and still be a virgin? The word Jew is enough to characterize a person. Calling that person nationalist is redundancy. The said Jews came up - as a beard - with the whole idea of making the creation of Israel appear to be a goal of theirs. What was their purpose? They wanted to appear to have goals which suited the people who wanted to do away with them. The Jews wanted the nationalists of the countries that had provided them a place to live to think that they – being nationalists themselves – wanted to have their own state as well. They wanted to appear as if they were about to relieve them off their presence so that they would stop being offensive. That was just early Jewish Zionist thimble-rigging with the goal to win more time and play games around the matter of their state which allowed them access to the high classes of the nations internationally. The Jewish state which was supposed to be under construction gave them access to other nations’ high societies and differentiated them from the gypsies or the Roma, for instance, who weren’t allowed to be part of anything. The Jews were omnipresent as shadow politicians of a shadow nation which existed nowhere in the world. After they had secured an alibi, they looked for ways to maintain their privileges and survive the industrial era. It was an era that threatened them with annihilation as it deluged their haunts with ambitious Christians who begrudged their wealth and usurped their clientele. Rome could no longer protect them by issuing decrees as the societal evolution also cost it in privileges. It had been holding back evolution for centuries but now it was out of its control. At the beginning of the industrial revolution Rome – and its Jewish underlings – was aware that a new populous and even more powerful middle class was going to emerge from the working class. The salaries – even the lowest ones – of the workers would allow them to educate their children, a fact that made the situation irreversible. Rome and the Jews along with it would have no choice but to tolerate the developments. All those Christian newcomers to the middle class who were the product of the industrial era would step into their turfs and seek their destiny in the place which only the Jews were supposed to occupy. From the moment they could not stop that evolution they would at least have to find a way to control it, so controlling the middle classes of not only the industrial but also of other states became their goal. Bankers and communists Watching industrial Europe try to find a universal solution through industrial evolution, the verminous – because of the nature of their businesses – Jews started worrying about their profits. Seeing that they were unwelcome in the nationalist Europe – which for the most part had no intention to include them in its future planning – they were alarmed. Watching the nations’ evolution come down on them menacingly they were forced to go beyond national borders. They weren’t going to allow “Belle Epoque” (Beautiful Season) become nightmarish epoque. The Great Illusion, which forewarned the definitive end of wars, was the beginning of the nightmare for them. Assuming that some Europeans dreamt of the era when wars ended, the Jews identified that end with their own end. There would be no more huge profits, and the worst part was that new questions would be posed as to their stay in Europe. The inventers of the concept of nationalism were forced to just lean their hopes on internationalism, not become internationalists themselves. Which number, though, was it in their interest to bet on? On the new conflict fronts which were shaped at that time. Industrial evolution raised to the surface the new powerful belligerents of all conflicts, both state and social. This didn’t escape the Jews’ attention. We were about to move on from the conflicts between feudal states – with conquest being the ultimate goal – to conflicts between industrial states – with markets being the ultimate goal. We were about to move on from the conflicts between feudal barons and villeins – over a piece of land – to conflicts between industrialists and workers – over new benefits-. The Jews had to exercise full control over these new powers in society in order to continue their business in the sought-after area they had been monopolizing. They had to become internationalists to be able to fund conflicts between different nations. They had to become social bell-wethers to be able to direct social conflicts at will. It was a hard call. A new world was rising where the main enemies of the industrialists were the workers; the main enemies of employers were their employees; the main enemies of the exploiters were the exploitees. Every single one of them – barring none – needed the money and the latter was in the hands of the Jews. Once they had the money all that was missing was to find the happy medium that would allow them to use it in such a way that they could control the game on both sides. Industrialists needed money and money was a strong motive for corrupt paternalists. They had no choice as it was their only way to find allies to their activities. Once they had lent money they would be able to blackmail their clients; not let them think that money lent is money spent. And it was definitely money they would kiss goodbye to considering who they were planning to lend, namely the most powerful of the capitalists, the industrialists and the most powerful of the states, namely the industrial ones. Having knowledge that everything would take place under the pressure of war, they were well aware that they were taking the risk of being welshed on; not get their money and by that we mean both the original loan and the usurious profits. So, they had to find a way to maintain their professional relationship with the industrialists as well as the industrial states. They had to be able to regulate intra-societal relationships so that they would be able to threaten their debtors. This is why they put that sluggard Marx up to inventing a theory that suited them. Even that was not a novel idea. They weren’t the first ones to order a made-up scientific theory to serve their national interests. Haven’t the British done the same thing with Darwin’s absurd theory? The British took a ridiculous – and completely antichristian theory – and turned it into a life guide so that they can convince the nations that they – being superior to them – deserve to rule the entire world. Those times favored that kind of individual requests and the Jews weren’t stupid. Living in a new world which hadn’t found its rhythm yet, anybody could make any kind of allegations. People were feeling their way around and experimenting was part of the program. In the overall mayhem of the new trends and viewpoints which the Church could no longer control to the extent that it wanted, Marx’s theory emerged. Marx, who was – supposedly - a working man and whose character was thoroughly transformed due to the bankers, has explained to us the ways a laborer’s character can lose himself in the working space because of his employers. Marx, who sold himself to the bankers and became merchandise of a specific purpose, has explained to us the ways a worker can become a commodity in the hands of capitalists. The ultimate nationalist and Zionist Marx suggested that we abandon our adherence to our nation and become internationalists. These were Marx’s theories, roughly speaking. The Jewish man who hated labor and laborers took it upon himself to enlighten us about labor issues. Marx viewed working people as commodities which become victims of exploitation and results in them losing themselves in the industries. Therefore, industries – as well as all the means of production – should not belong to private individuals. Only a Jewish usurer, exploiter and sluggard like Marx could have conceived the concept of human commodity. Only a Jewish high-brow could have perceived the working human as an animal that loses itself for the simple reason that he views all humans – with the exception of the Jews – as inferior goyim. The whole sickening labor perception of the verminous and sluggard Jews has infiltrated Marx’s theory. Only a Jew like him could have hated work so much that it prevented him from realizing that work is the absolute means for human emancipation. Instead, he depicts work as a slaughter house that destroys him. Emancipation was essential to people back then so as to escape from the patronage of the priests, the feudal barons and the imposters. Only a Jew like Marx could have transformed into a commodity Creation’s ultimate form of capital, namely the HUMAN; the homo Sapiens, whose mind and body constitute the most perfect creative and productive machine nature has ever known. Each human alone, the absolute capital, constitutes a factory. These are the theories that good-for-nothing Marx came up with. Why? He did it because it suited his bosses and funders’ interests; because he wanted to create a conflict front between industrialists and laborers. His purpose was to cause targeted hatred among classes the way it suited the bankers; to provoke the instincts of illiterate laborers and keep them under his thumb; to level down the laborer and – taking advantage of his secret connections with the bankers and his ignorance - sell him protection; to transform the laborer into commodity himself and sell him as such to his own bosses and to whoever else offered enough money. In other words, Marx wanted to do what all Marxist supporters who are involved in trade unions do by trade. The Jewish bankers funded the fake philosopher’s stupid theory and that resulted in the latter becoming famous worldwide. That’s who Marx was and that’s what his theory was about. Had it not been funded by the bankers, his famous book Capital would have been directly sent for recycling. This is why – despite of all the propaganda, the money and the threats – his book has never become truly popular. It only gained popularity as a manual for exploiting the middle class. It became popular to wage-e

Αυτό το μήνυμα παρουσιάζεται σε συνοπτική μορφή

Προβολή ολόκληρου του μηνύματος